Category: Publications

The Arctic Mediterranean In Interacting Climates of Ocean Basins Observations, Mechanisms, Predictability, and Impacts

Eldevik, T., Smedsrud, L.H., Li, C., Årthun, M., Madonna, E., Svendsen, L. 2020: The Arctic Mediterranean. In: Mechoso (Ed.). Interacting Climates of Ocean Basins Observations, Mechanisms, Predictability, and Impacts. Cambridge University Press, 2020, 186-215 . https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108610995.007 .
Summary: The Arctic Mediterranean sits on the “top of the world” and connects the Atlantic and Pacific climate realms via the cold Arctic. It is the combined basin of the Nordic Seas (the Norwegian, Iceland, and Greenland seas) and the Arctic Ocean confined by the Arctic land masses – thus making it a Mediterranean ocean (Figure 6.1; e.g., Aagaard et al., 1985). The Arctic Mediterranean is small for a World Ocean but its heat loss and freshwater uptake is disproportionally large (e.g., Ganachaud and Wunsch, 2000; Eldevik and Nilsen, 2013; Haine et al., 2015). With the combined presence of the Gulf Stream’s northern limb, regional freshwater stratification, and a retreating sea-ice cover, it is likely where water mass contrasts, shifting air-ocean-ice interaction, and climate change are most pronounced in the present world oceans (Stocker et al., 2013; Vihma, 2014).

Link to publication. You are most welcome to contact us or the corresponding author(s) directly, if you have questions.

Basin Interactions and Predictability. In: Interacting Climates of Ocean Basins: Observations, Mechanisms, Predictability, and Impacts

Keenlyside, N., Y. Kosaka, N. Vigaud, A. Robertson, Y. Wang, D. Dommenget, J.-J. Luo, and D. Matei. 2020: Basin Interactions and Predictability, In: Mechoso (Ed.). Interacting Climates of Ocean Basins Observations, Mechanisms, Predictability, and Impacts. Cambridge University Press, 2020, 258-292 .
Summary: The general public is familiar with weather forecasts and their utility, and the field of weather forecasting is well-established. Even the theoretical limit of the weather forecasting – two weeks – is known. In contrast, familiarity with climate prediction is low outside of the research field, the theoretical basis is not fully established, and we do not know the extent to which climate can be predicted. Variations in climate, however, can have large societal and economic consequences, as they can lead to droughts and floods, and spells of extreme hot and cold weather. Thus, improving our capabilities to predict climate is important and urgent, as it can enhance climate services and thereby contribute to the sustainable development of humans in this era of climate change.

Link to chapter. You are most welcome to contact us or the corresponding author(s) directly, if you have questions.

Relating model bias and prediction skill in the equatorial Atlantic

Counillon, F., Keenlyside, N., Toniazzo, T., Koseki, S., Demissie, T., Bethke, I., Wang, Y. 2021: Relating model bias and prediction skill in the equatorial Atlantic. Climate Dynamics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-020-05605-8

For a nice overview of the article, check out this news piece by our partner NERSC, also involved in our collaborative projects TRIATLAS and STERCP.

Summary: We investigate the impact of large climatological biases in the tropical Atlantic on reanalysis and seasonal prediction performance using the Norwegian Climate Prediction Model (NorCPM) in a standard and an anomaly coupled configuration. Anomaly coupling corrects the climatological surface wind and sea surface temperature (SST) fields exchanged between oceanic and atmospheric models, and thereby significantly reduces the climatological model biases of precipitation and SST. NorCPM combines the Norwegian Earth system model with the ensemble Kalman filter and assimilates SST and hydrographic profiles. We perform a reanalysis for the period 1980–2010 and a set of seasonal predictions for the period 1985–2010 with both model configurations. Anomaly coupling improves the accuracy and the reliability of the reanalysis in the tropical Atlantic, because the corrected model enables a dynamical reconstruction that satisfies better the observations and their uncertainty. Anomaly coupling also enhances seasonal prediction skill in the equatorial Atlantic to the level of the best models of the North American multi-model ensemble, while the standard model is among the worst. However, anomaly coupling slightly damps the amplitude of Atlantic Niño and Niña events. The skill enhancements achieved by anomaly coupling are largest for forecast started from August and February. There is strong spring predictability barrier, with little skill in predicting conditions in June. The anomaly coupled system show some skill in predicting the secondary Atlantic Niño-II SST variability that peaks in November–December from August 1st.

Link to publication. You are most welcome to contact us or the corresponding author(s) directly, if you have questions.

Mechanisms and pathways of ocean heat anomalies in the Arctic-Atlantic region (PhD thesis)

Asbjørnsen, Helene (2020-12-10). Mechanisms and pathways of ocean heat anomalies in the Arctic-Atlantic region (PhD thesis, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway). https://bora.uib.no/bora-xmlui/handle/11250/2712025 .

Summary: Along the Atlantic water pathway, from the Gulf Stream in the south to the Arctic Ocean in the north, variability in ocean heat content is pronounced on interannual to decadal time scales. Ocean heat anomalies in this Arctic-Atlantic sector are known to affect Arctic sea ice extent, marine ecosystems, and continental climate. However, there is at present neither consensus nor any complete understanding of the mechanisms causing such heat anomalies. This dissertation obtains a more robust understanding of regional ocean heat content variability by assessing the mechanisms and pathways of ocean heat anomalies in the Arctic-Atlantic region. The results are presented in three papers.

The first paper investigates the link between a variable Nordic Seas inflow and large- scale ocean circulation changes upstream. Using a global, eddy-permitting ocean hind- cast together with a Lagrangian analysis tool, numerical particles are seeded at the Iceland-Scotland Ridge and tracked backward in time. Water from the subtropics sup- plied by the North Atlantic Current (NAC) is found to be the main component of the Nordic Seas inflow (64%), while 26% of the inflow has a subpolar or Arctic origin. Different atmospheric patterns are seen to affect the circulation strength along the advective pathways, as well as the supply of subtropical and Arctic-origin water to the ridge through shifts in the NAC and the subpolar front. A robust link between a high transport of Arctic-origin water and a cold and fresh inflow is furthermore established, while a high transport of subtropical water leads to higher inflow salinities. The second paper investigates the mechanisms of interannual heat content variability in the Norwegian Sea downstream of the Iceland-Scotland Ridge, using a state-of-the-art ocean state estimate and closed heat budget diagnostics. Ocean advection is found to be the primary contributor to heat content variability in the Atlantic domain of the Norwegian Sea, although local surface fluxes also play an active role. Anomalous heat advection furthermore depends on the strength of the Atlantic water inflow and the conditions upstream of the ridge. Combined, the two papers demonstrate the importance of gyre dynamics and large-scale wind forcing in causing variability at the ridge, while high- lighting the impacts on Norwegian Sea heat content downstream.

For the third paper, warming trends in the Barents Sea and Fram Strait are explored, and, thus, the mechanisms underlying recent Atlantification of the Arctic Ocean. The Barents Sea is seen to transition to a warmer state, with reduced sea ice concentrations and Atlantic water extending further poleward. The mechanisms driving the warming are, however, found to be regionally dependent and not stationary in time. In the ice- free region, ocean advection is found to be a major driver of the warming trend due to increasing inflow temperatures in the late 1990s and early 2000s, while reduced ocean heat loss is contributing to the warming trend from the mid-2000s and onward. A considerable upper-ocean warming and a weakened stratification is seen in the ice- covered northwestern Barents Sea. However, in contrast to what has been previously hypothesized, the results do not point to increased upward heat fluxes from the Atlantic water layer to the Arctic surface layer as the source of the upper-ocean warming.

The supply of Atlantic heat to the Nordic Seas and the Arctic Ocean has been scrutinized using both Lagrangian methods and heat budget diagnostics. Combined, the three papers demonstrate the important role of ocean heat transport in causing regional heat content variability and change in the Arctic-Atlantic region. A better understanding of interannual to decadal ocean heat content variability has implications for future prediction efforts, and for how we understand the ocean’s role in ongoing and future climate change.

Link to publication. You are most welcome to contact us or the corresponding author(s) directly, if you have questions.

The seasonal and regional transition to an ice‐free Arctic

Arthun, M., Onarheim, I. H., Dörr, J., Eldevik, T. 2020: The seasonal and regional transition to an ice‐free Arctic. Geophysical Research Letters 47. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090825
Summary: We examine current and future Arctic sea ice loss in the latest generation of global climate models (CMIP6) focusing on regional and seasonal variability. We find that, unlike today, future Arctic sea ice loss will take place in all regions and all seasons. All Arctic shelf seas will become ice free in summer even if we follow a low emission scenario. Although future sea ice loss also takes place in winter, only the Barents Sea becomes ice free in winter before the end of this century.

Link to publication. You are most welcome to contact us or the corresponding author(s) directly, if you have questions.

Subseasonal prediction of winter precipitation in southern China using the early November snowpack over the Urals

Li, J., Li, F., Wang, H. 2020: Subseasonal prediction of winter precipitation in southern China using the early November snowpack over the Urals. Atmospheric and Oceanic Science Letters. https://doi.org/10.1080/16742834.2020.1824547

Summary: Evolution of the autumn snowpack has been considered as a potential source for the subseasonal predictability of winter surface air temperature, but its linkage to precipitation variability has been less well discussed. This study shows that the snow water equivalent (SWE) over the Urals region in early (1–14) November is positively associated with precipitation in southern China during 15–21 November and 6–15 January, based on the study period 1979/80–2016/17. In early November, a decreased Urals SWE warms the air locally via diabatic heating, indicative of significant land–atmosphere coupling over the Urals region. Meanwhile, a stationary Rossby wave train originates from the Urals and propagates along the polar-front jet stream. In mid (15–21) November, this Rossby wave train propagates downstream toward East Asia and, combined with the deepened East Asian trough, reduces the precipitation over southern China by lessening the water vapor transport. Thereafter, during 22 November to 5 January, there are barely any obvious circulation anomalies owing to the weak land–atmosphere coupling over the Urals. In early (6–15) January, the snowpack expands southward to the north of the Mediterranean Sea and cools the overlying atmosphere, suggestive of land–atmosphere coupling occurring over western Europe. A stationary Rossby wave train trapped in the subtropical westerly jet stream appears along with anomalous cyclonic circulation over Europe, and again with a deepened East Asian trough and less precipitation over southern China. The current findings have implications for winter precipitation prediction in southern China on the subseasonal timescale.

Link to publication. You are most welcome to contact us or the corresponding author(s) directly, if you have questions.

North Atlantic climate far more predictable than models imply

Smith, D.M., Scaife, A.A., Eade, R. et al. 2020: North Atlantic climate far more predictable than models imply. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2525-0 .

Summary: Quantifying signals and uncertainties in climate models is essential for the detection, attribution, prediction and projection of climate change1,2,3. Although inter-model agreement is high for large-scale temperature signals, dynamical changes in atmospheric circulation are very uncertain4. This leads to low confidence in regional projections, especially for precipitation, over the coming decades5,6. The chaotic nature of the climate system7,8,9 may also mean that signal uncertainties are largely irreducible. However, climate projections are difficult to verify until further observations become available. Here we assess retrospective climate model predictions of the past six decades and show that decadal variations in North Atlantic winter climate are highly predictable, despite a lack of agreement between individual model simulations and the poor predictive ability of raw model outputs. Crucially, current models underestimate the predictable signal (the predictable fraction of the total variability) of the North Atlantic Oscillation (the leading mode of variability in North Atlantic atmospheric circulation) by an order of magnitude. Consequently, compared to perfect models, 100 times as many ensemble members are needed in current models to extract this signal, and its effects on the climate are underestimated relative to other factors. To address these limitations, we implement a two-stage post-processing technique. We first adjust the variance of the ensemble-mean North Atlantic Oscillation forecast to match the observed variance of the predictable signal. We then select and use only the ensemble members with a North Atlantic Oscillation sufficiently close to the variance-adjusted ensemble-mean forecast North Atlantic Oscillation. This approach greatly improves decadal predictions of winter climate for Europe and eastern North America. Predictions of Atlantic multidecadal variability are also improved, suggesting that the North Atlantic Oscillation is not driven solely by Atlantic multidecadal variability. Our results highlight the need to understand why the signal-to-noise ratio is too small in current climate models10, and the extent to which correcting this model error would reduce uncertainties in regional climate change projections on timescales beyond a decade.

Link to publication. You are most welcome to contact us or the corresponding author(s) directly, if you have questions.

Combining data assimilation and machine learning to emulate a dynamical model from sparse and noisy observations: A case study with the Lorenz 96 model.

Brajard, J., Carrassi, A., Bocquet, M., Bertino, L. 2020: Combining data assimilation and machine learning to emulate a dynamical model from sparse and noisy observations: A case study with the Lorenz 96 model. Geoscientific Model Development. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2020.101171 .

Summary: A novel method, based on the combination of data assimilation and machine learning is introduced. The new hybrid approach is designed for a two-fold scope: (i) emulating hidden, possibly chaotic, dynamics and (ii) predicting their future states. The method consists in applying iteratively a data assimilation step, here an ensemble Kalman filter, and a neural network. Data assimilation is used to optimally combine a surrogate model with sparse noisy data. The output analysis is spatially complete and is used as a training set by the neural network to update the surrogate model. The two steps are then repeated iteratively. Numerical experiments have been carried out using the chaotic 40-variables Lorenz 96 model, proving both convergence and statistical skill of the proposed hybrid approach. The surrogate model shows short-term forecast skill up to two Lyapunov times, the retrieval of positive Lyapunov exponents as well as the more energetic frequencies of the power density spectrum. The sensitivity of the method to critical setup parameters is also presented: the forecast skill decreases smoothly with increased observational noise but drops abruptly if less than half of the model domain is observed. The successful synergy between data assimilation and machine learning, proven here with a low-dimensional system, encourages further investigation of such hybrids with more sophisticated dynamics.

Link to publication. You are most welcome to contact us or the corresponding author(s) directly, if you have questions.

Atlantic Multidecadal Variability (AMV) in the Norwegian Earth System model (Master’s thesis)

Vågane, Julie Solsvik (2020-06-26). Atlantic Multidecadal Variability (AMV) in the Norwegian Earth System model (Master’s thesis, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway). http://bora.uib.no/handle/1956/22970 .

Summary: The causes of low-frequency sea surface temperature (SST) variations in the Atlantic, known as Atlantic Multidecadal Variability (AMV), are debated. AMV has climatic impacts on for instance hurricane activity and Sahel rainfall, and understanding AMV can improve decadal predictions. While some discuss whether AMV arises due to external forcing, the ocean dynamics or the thermodynamic atmosphere-ocean interaction, others question the very existence of AMV. In this thesis, I look at the Norwegian Earth System Model (NorESM), investigating low-frequency variability and possible drivers for AMV in the North Atlantic. I compute a heat budget and a multiple linear regression (MLR) model, and investigate the influence of the dynamics and thermodynamics on AMV on different time scales and regions. I use the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) and the Atlantic Meridional Overturning circulation (AMOC) to characterize the large-scale impacts associated with ocean and atmospheric circulation patterns. The MLR model with NAO and AMOC, manages to explain 20.5 % of the temperature tendency on an interannual time scale, and 34.8 % on a decadal time scale in the subpolar gyre (SPG). In the tropics, the variance explained is smaller, only explaining 6.5 % interannually and 9.6 % decadally. Through a comparison with observations, I found that the AMOC amplitude is underestimated and the SST is off by over 1C. This may influence the performance of the MLR model. Finally, I present some ideas for improving the MLR model and the possibility for decadal predictions.

Link to publication. You are most welcome to contact us or the corresponding author(s) directly, if you have questions.

Mechanisms underlying recent Arctic Atlantification

Asbjørnsen, H., Årthun, M., Skagseth, Ø., Eldevik, T. 2020: Mechanisms underlying recent Arctic Atlantification. Geophys. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL088036 .
Summary: Recent “Atlantification” of the Arctic is characterized by warmer ocean temperatures and a reduced sea ice cover. The Barents Sea is a “hot spot” for these changes, something which has broad socioeconomic and environmental impacts in the region. However, there is, at present, no complete understanding of what is causing the ocean warming. Here, we determine the relative importance of transport of heat by ocean currents (ocean advection) and heat exchanges between the atmosphere and the ocean (air-sea heat fluxes) in warming the Barents Sea and Fram Strait. In the ice-free region, ocean advection is found to be the main driver of the warming trend due to increasing inflow temperatures between 1996 and 2006. In the marginal ice zone and the ice-covered northern Barents Sea, ocean advection and air-sea heat fluxes are found to be of interchanging importance in driving the warming trend through the 1993–2014 period analyzed. A better understanding of the recent warming trends in the Barents Sea and Fram Strait has implications for how we understand the ocean’s role in ongoing and future Arctic climate change.

Link to publication. You are most welcome to contact us or the corresponding author(s) directly, if you have questions.