Tag: ogawa

Pacific oceanic front amplifies the impact of Atlantic oceanic front on North Atlantic blocking

Cheung, HN., Omrani, NE., Ogawa, F., Keenlyside, N., Nakamura, H., Zhou, W. 2023: Pacific oceanic front amplifies the impact of Atlantic oceanic front on North Atlantic blocking. npj Clim Atmos Sci 6, 61. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-023-00370-x

Summary: Atmospheric blocking is a crucial driver of extreme weather events, but its climatological frequency is largely underestimated in state-of-the-art climate models, especially around the North Atlantic. While air-sea interaction along the North Atlantic oceanic frontal region is known to influence Atlantic blocking activity, remote effects from the Pacific have been less studied. Here we use semi-idealised experiments with an atmospheric general circulation model to demonstrate that the mid-latitude Pacific oceanic front is crucial for climatological Atlantic blocking activity. The front intensifies the Pacific eddy-driven jet that extends eastward towards the North Atlantic. The eastward-extended Pacific jet reinforces the North Atlantic circulation response to the Atlantic oceanic front, including the storm track activity and the eddy-driven jet. The strengthening of the eddy-driven jet reduces the Greenland blocking frequency. Moreover, the Pacific oceanic front greatly strengthens the stationary planetary-scale ridge in Europe. Together with a stronger northeastward extension of the Atlantic storm track, enhanced interaction between extratropical cyclones and the European ridge favours the occurrence of Euro-Atlantic blocking. Therefore, the North Atlantic circulation response amplified remotely by the Pacific oceanic front substantially increases Euro-Atlantic blocking frequency while decreasing Greenland blocking frequency.

Link to publication. You are most welcome to contact us or the corresponding author(s) directly, if you have questions.

Assessing the influence of sea surface temperature and arctic sea ice cover on the uncertainty in the boreal winter future climate projections

Cheung, HN., Keenlyside, N., Koenigk, T., Yang, S., Tian, T., Xu, Z., Gao, Y., Ogawa, F., Omrani, N.-E., Qiao, S., Zhou, W. 2022: Assessing the influence of sea surface temperature and arctic sea ice cover on the uncertainty in the boreal winter future climate projections. Clim. Dyn. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06136-0

Summary: We investigate the uncertainty (i.e., inter-model spread) in future projections of the boreal winter climate, based on the forced response of ten models from the CMIP5 following the RCP8.5 scenario. The uncertainty in the forced response of sea level pressure (SLP) is large in the North Pacific, the North Atlantic, and the Arctic. A major part of these uncertainties (31%) is marked by a pattern with a center in the northeastern Pacific and a dipole over the northeastern Atlantic that we label as the Pacific–Atlantic SLP uncertainty pattern (PA∆SLP). The PA∆SLP is associated with distinct global sea surface temperature (SST) and Arctic sea ice cover (SIC) perturbation patterns. To better understand the nature of the PA∆SLP, these SST and SIC perturbation patterns are prescribed in experiments with two atmospheric models (AGCMs): CAM4 and IFS. The AGCM responses suggest that the SST uncertainty contributes to the North Pacific SLP uncertainty in CMIP5 models, through tropical–midlatitude interactions and a forced Rossby wavetrain. The North Atlantic SLP uncertainty in CMIP5 models is better explained by the combined effect of SST and SIC uncertainties, partly related to a Rossby wavetrain from the Pacific and air-sea interaction over the North Atlantic. Major discrepancies between the CMIP5 and AGCM forced responses over northern high-latitudes and continental regions are indicative of uncertainties arising from the AGCMs. We analyze the possible dynamic mechanisms of these responses, and discuss the limitations of this work.

Link to publication. You are most welcome to contact us or the corresponding author(s) directly, if you have questions.

Evaluating Impacts of Recent Arctic Sea Ice Loss on the Northern Hemisphere Winter Climate Change

Ogawa, F., N. Keenlyside, Y. Gao, T. Koenigk, S. Yang, L. Suo, T. Wang, G. Gastineau, T. Nakamura, N. Cheung Ho, N. E. Omrani, J. Ukita, and V. Semenov, 2018: Evaluating Impacts of Recent Arctic Sea Ice Loss on the Northern Hemisphere Winter Climate Change. Geophysical Research Letters, 45, 3255-3263.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076502

Read more

Impact of ocean and sea ice initialisation on seasonal prediction skill in the Arctic

Kimmritz, M., F. Counillon, L. H. Smedsrud, I. Bethke, N. Keenlyside, F. Ogawa, and Y. Wang:. 2019: Impact of ocean and sea ice initialisation on seasonal prediction skill in the Arctic. JAMES https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001825 .

Summary:The declining Arctic sea ice entails both risks and opportunities for the Arctic ecosystem, communities, and economic activities. Reliable seasonal predictions of the Arctic sea ice could help to guide decisionmakers to benefit from arising opportunities and to mitigate increased risks in the Arctic. However, despite some success, seasonal prediction systems in the Arctic have not exploited their full potential yet. For instance, so far only a single model component, for example, the ocean, has been updated in isolation to derive a skillful initial state, though joint updates across model components, for example, the ocean and the sea ice, are expected to perform better. Here, we introduce a system that, for the first time, deploys joint updates of the ocean and the sea ice state, using data of the ocean hydrography and sea ice concentration, for seasonal prediction in the Arctic. By comparing this setup with a system that updates only the ocean in isolation, we assess the added skill of facilitating sea ice concentration data to jointly update the ocean and the sea ice. While the update of the ocean alone leads to skillful winter predictions only in the North Atlantic, the joint update strongly enhances the overall skill.

Link to publication. You are most welcome to contact us or the corresponding author(s) directly, if you have questions.