![](https://bcpu.w.uib.no/files/2020/04/Skjermbilde-2020-04-28-kl.-19.11.10-150x150.png)
“Where do the ice edge borders go?”
In Bergen, on June 5-7th 2019, we will host for the third time running the workshop on Climate Prediction in the Arctic and North Atlantic sector. See the agenda here.
This year, we are joined by the EU H2020 modelling cluster, to discuss mechanisms of, and limitations to, predictability, and the challenges to developing climate services. Streaming link will be provided beforehand.
Asbjørnsen, H., M. Årthun, Ø. Skagseth, Eldevik, T. 2019: Mechanisms of ocean heat anomalies in the Norwegian Sea. JGR Oceans. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC014649
Summary: Ocean heat content in the Norwegian Sea exhibits pronounced variability on interannual to decadal time scales. These ocean heat anomalies are known to influence Arctic sea ice extent, marine ecosystems, and continental climate. It nevertheless remains unknown to what extent such heat anomalies are produced locally within the Norwegian Sea, and to what extent the region is more of a passive receiver of anomalies formed elsewhere. A main practical challenge has been the lack of closed heat budget diagnostics. In order to address this issue, a regional heat budget is calculated for the Norwegian Sea using the ECCOv4 ocean state estimate—a dynamically and kinematically consistent model framework fitted to ocean observations for the period 1992–2015. The depth-integrated Norwegian Sea heat budget shows that both ocean advection and air-sea heat fluxes play an active role in the formation of interannual heat content anomalies. A spatial analysis of the individual heat budget terms shows that ocean advection is the primary contributor to heat content variability in the Atlantic domain of the Norwegian Sea. Anomalous heat advection furthermore depends on the strength of the Atlantic water inflow, which is related to large-scale circulation changes in the subpolar North Atlantic. This result suggests a potential for predicting Norwegian Sea heat content based on upstream conditions. However, local surface forcing (air-sea heat fluxes and Ekman forcing) within the Norwegian Sea substantially modifies the phase and amplitude of ocean heat anomalies along their poleward pathway, and, hence, acts to limit predictability.
Link to publication. You are most welcome to contact us or the corresponding author(s) directly, if you have questions.
Årthun, M., B. Bogstad, U. Daewel, N. S. Keenlyside, A. B. Sandø, C. Schrum, and G. Ottersen, 2018: Climate based multi-year predictions of the Barents Sea cod stock. PLOS ONE, 13, e0206319.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206319
“Wet and mild”
Read more at Klassekampen (Norwegian)
Årthun, M., E. W. Kolstad, T. Eldevik, and N. S. Keenlyside, 2018: Time Scales and Sources of European Temperature Variability. Geophysical Research Letters, 45, 3597-3604.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/2018GL077401
Kimmritz, M., F. Counillon, C. M. Bitz, F. Massonnet, I. Bethke, and Y. Gao, 2017: Optimising assimilation of sea ice concentration in an Earth system model with a multicategory sea ice model. Tellus A,, 70.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/16000870.2018.1435945